← Back to discovery

Summerhill

A. S. Neill

199832 pagesabout 30–45 minutes
1998
first published
  • 1960Pocket Books · 392 pages · ENGISBN 9780671790011
  • 1962Victor Gollancz · 32 pages · ENGISBN 9780575002937
  • 1970Hart Pub. Co. · 271 pages · ENGISBN 9780805510751
  • 1984Pocket Books · 392 pages · ENGISBN 9780671813024
  • 1990Penguin · 352 pages · ENGISBN 9780140135596
  • 2012Eumo Editorial SAU · 424 pagesISBN 9788497664233
  • 2018Fondo de Cultura Económica · 331 pagesISBN 9786071651037
  • 2019Lulu.com · 418 pagesISBN 9780359608102

**Summerhill: A Radical Approach to Child Rearing** is a book about the English boarding school Summerhill School by its headmaster A. S. Neill. It is known for introducing his ideas to the American public. It was published in America on November 7, 1960, by the Hart Publishing Company and later revised as **Summerhill School: A New View of Childhood** in 1993. Its contents are a repackaged collection from four of Neill's previous works. The foreword was written by psychoanalyst Erich Fromm, who distinguished between authoritarian coercion and Summerhill. The seven chapters of the book cover the origins and implementation of the school, and other topics in childrearing. Summerhill, founded in the 1920s, is run as a children's democracy under Neill's educational philosophy of self-regulation, where kids choose whether to go to lessons and how they want to live freely without imposing on others. The school makes its rules at a weekly schoolwide meeting where students and teachers each have one vote alike. Neill discarded other pedagogies for one of the innate goodness of the child. Despite selling no advance copies in America, *Summerhill* brought Neill significant renown in the next decade, wherein he sold three million copies. The book was used in hundreds of college courses and translated into languages such as German. Reviewers noted Neill's charismatic personality, but doubted the project's general replicability elsewhere and its overstated generalizations. They put Neill in a lineage of experimental thought, but questioned his lasting contribution to psychology. The book begat an American Summerhillian following, cornered an education criticism market, and made Neill into a folk leader.

How do you feel?